Apr 19 2008
The 2020 Summit
Watching 2020 today was depressing.
The joy at Howard’s political demise was, not unexpectedly, a short-lived euphoria. I quite like Rudd, if only for the fact that he is an unashamedly intelligent man and intelligence is not a much loved quality in Australian life, but the 2020 summit didn’t feel like “a breath of fresh air”. Yes, it had a very different atmosphere than anything that would have been possible under Howard, but all I was left with was a feeling of frustration, and worse, disillusionment. Not disillusionment with the government which, in my opinion (I’m a philosophical anarchist), has little to offer anyway but with the complete lack of ideas.
Philosophical anarchism isn’t about storming parliament or violent revolt (though I understand the inclination): It’s about organic change which renders our current political structures obsolete. It’s about building alternative ways of doing things. It’s a positive philosophy, a humanist philosophy. It is optimistic about what humans are capable of.
And it is independent.
2020 is supposed to be about ideas. And there were none. Each “stream” - health, the arts, etc - came back with the same tired thoughts. We should set up a commission, an independent body, an “insert new political job title here”. We should educate the public about… And as my particular anarchism has always been somewhat socialist, I hated the voice in my head which was getting angry that no one could think of any way to improve our society except having the government spend money. And my sense of social justice hated that I don’t care whether or not there are indigenous representatives on every art board even though I am fully aware that if the government “makes it so” it won’t do anything to put indigenous art “front and centre”.
Indigenous art will never be front and centre. Art will never be front and centre. And should “cultural production” be in the government’s domain anyway? I hated that the majority of my thoughts in response to what I was hearing sounded like right wing echoes. Why should the government prop up the arts, I thought. Surely, if the arts cannot maintain themselves, our society is bankrupt anyway. And does art really flourish under the aegis of bureaucracy? I don’t think so.
I don’t want the government’s fingers in every aspect of our society. I want a society that can support itself, that wants to support itself. Today, I’m disillusioned by seeing how much it doesn’t want to, how much it thinks everything is the government’s responsibility even to the point of choosing what food we eat (banning “unhealthy” food was one suggestion).
As far as I’m concerned, if we must live in nation states and pay our taxes to them (and for the foreseeable future, we must) then they should provide healthcare, education, social security where needed and maybe some infrastructure.
Then they should fuck off.
I can’t remember who said it, but if man is incapable of ruling himself, he is surely incapable of ruling others. I always thought that, maybe, one day, ruling ourselves we could manage. Today, everyone abdicated. Today, everyone was a child looking to an imagined parent to orchestrate their lives. Obviously when someone envisages a world of adults that isn’t the greatest thing to watch, but worse than that, today I couldn’t even register the potential for it.
And I don’t know what that says about me and my “optimism”.
[Note: This is really not a balanced explanation of my political stance - Rather, it is just a tired response to a moribund event. ]



